Labels:book | reckoner | sky | tree OCR: In this case the parties filed cross motions for suI- mary judgment 18. 30 The City's position was that Section 3001(1) exempted the process of incineraling waste and producing ash a1 resource recovery facility from regulation 35 hazardous waste addition to filing 1fs own motion for XIEMWNS judgment, EDF opposed the City' motion on the ground that the City had not yet demonstrated that the City's facility mct the require. ments of Section 3001(1 The district court cancluded that Scction 3001 {i} of RCRA exempied the ash produced 3 Iesource recovery facilitics from regulation as hazardous waste. Pel 22a The held that Congress amended RCRA to excmpt resource rccoverv facilities from hazardous waste regulations, intonded to exclude all waste man- agement activities these facilities from regul ...
(.png)
